Quantcast

NW Twin Cities

Wednesday, October 1, 2025

Walter Hudson reacts to fraud indictments and political shifts in Minnesota social program oversight

Webp fx42ac4madrhmnb0jusa2gc0uteu

Walter Hudson, Minnesota State Representative from 30A District | Official Website

Walter Hudson, Minnesota State Representative from 30A District | Official Website

Walter Hudson, a Minnesota state legislator and commentator, posted a series of tweets on September 22, 2025, discussing recent developments in the state's handling of fraud within social programs as well as reactions to public commentary.

In his first post at 4:43 a.m., Hudson referenced statements made by U.S. Attorney Joe Thompson during a press conference regarding new indictments for fraud related to Minnesota's social programs. He wrote: "U.S. Attorney Joe Thompson, serving Minnesota, made extraordinary earth-shattering statements in a recent press conference announcing new indictments for fraud in the state's generous social programs.

Let's tick through what he said, and the sobering implications." Thompson’s announcement highlights ongoing efforts by federal authorities to address fraudulent activity within public assistance systems.

Shortly after, at 4:46 a.m., Hudson commented on political maneuvering surrounding the state's Fraud Committee. He stated: "My favorite part of this is how Pinto suggests someone else should take over the Fraud Committee because Chair Robbins is running for governor.

Be careful what you wish for, buddy." The tweet references Rep. Dave Pinto and Rep. Anne Robbins—Robbins currently chairs the committee but is reportedly considering a gubernatorial campaign.

Later that morning at 5:10 a.m., Hudson addressed feedback received from his earlier posts. He wrote: "The comments I'm seeing in response to this are disturbing.

I don't know how you can possibly consider yourself a Christian and think that one people group is uniquely responsible for sin.

We're all sons of Adam. None of us escape his accountability. None."

Minnesota has experienced increased scrutiny over its administration of social welfare programs due to several high-profile cases involving fraud investigations and prosecutions in recent years. State legislators have debated measures aimed at increasing oversight and accountability while ensuring continued support for eligible residents.